What this guide helps you decide
- whether downtime has real consequences
- whether multiple nodes are enough to justify HA planning
- whether backups, monitoring, and incident ownership are ready
- whether Base Kit should still be the deployable first step
Current status
The High Availability Kit is documented as a vision-oriented target architecture. Use Base Kit for production deployments today unless you are intentionally evaluating the HA design.Readiness checklist
You are closer to HA readiness when you can answer yes to most of these:- There are at least three suitable nodes.
- Important services have documented recovery steps.
- Backups are tested, not only configured.
- Monitoring exists outside the service being monitored.
- DNS and routing failure modes are understood.
- Someone owns incident response.
- You know which services actually require high availability.
Common false signals
These do not automatically mean you need HA:- owning multiple servers
- wanting faster services
- running public apps
- having many Docker containers
- wanting backups
When HA is justified
High availability is worth planning when downtime creates business, customer, or operational risk. Examples:- startup services with customer impact
- authentication or access services required by a team
- production apps with external users
- critical monitoring or routing infrastructure
How this maps to the finder
The finder treats startup intent,3+ servers, public services, and startup-service use cases as HA signals. It may still recommend “Base Kit first” as the deployable starting point while marking High Availability as the target direction.